The Panama Papers Exposed These Dirty Banks… Here’s How You Can Profit

1 | By Shah Gilani

On Wednesday, I told you that the world was just beginning to reckon with the fallout from the Panama Papers, the 11.5 million emails hacked from Panamanian law firm Mossack Fonseca.

That’s because investigators around the world have only just begun to sift through the wreckage.

After U.S. tax authorities, the U.S. Justice Department, Panamanian, Brazilian, Thai, British, and a handful of other outraged countries launched their own inquiries, the Joint International Tax Shelter Information and Collaboration (Jitsic) Network convened a meeting of 28 nations in Paris on Wednesday to coordinate joint investigations.

The unprecedented international coalition intends to look into the 210,000 companies domiciled in 21 different offshore jurisdictions uncovered in Mossack Fonseca emails.

Not only are investigations going to lead to a lot of buried treasure, they’re going to bury a lot of rich, powerful, and crooked people.

And that’s not all…

Of the over 500 banks and bank subsidiaries implicated in the Panama Papers, some are major global banks.

That creates a major trading opportunity for us – and I’ll show you how to get into position to catch profits as investigators follow the paper trail.

But first, let the digging begin…

Digging Up the Dirt

So far, we know 15 people already named are either current or former heads of state or government leaders. They include: Sigmundur Gunnlaugsson, the prime minister of Iceland, who already temporarily stepped aside over disclosures of his interest in a shell company; Saudi King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud; UAE President and Emir of Abu Dhabi Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nanyan; Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, President of Ukraine; UK Prime Minister David Cameron; former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi; and former Pakistan Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, former prime minister of Pakistan.

Hundreds of other government officials and friends of government bigwigs are disclosed in the Papers, including: Former minister of finance of France and former managing director of the IMF Dominique Strauss-Kahn; former president of the Supreme Federal Court of Brazil Joaquim Barbosa; former head of North Korea’s Daedong Credit Bank Kim Choi Sam; eight current and former members of China’s Politburo Standing Committee; family members of China’s past and present presidents and party leaders; and friends of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And of course a lot of rich and powerful moguls, celebrities, Hollywood royalty, and sports icons are beneficial owners or investors in uncovered shell companies.

Entertainment billionaire mogul and co-founder of Dreamworks David Geffen is on the list. So is actor Jackie Chan and American Idol creator Simon Cowell. And sports legends: golfer Nick Faldo, winner of three Master’s tournaments, and soccer icon Lionel Messi, are all implicated.

Even the CIA shows up in Mossack Fonseca’s email files. We may never know who they were fronting, backing, enriching, for what reasons, and to whose ultimate detriment. But maybe some of it will come out.

As I told you on Wednesday, there are lots of legitimate reasons to set up so-called shell companies – and it’s possible that many of the people listed above were not party to any illegal activity.

It’s the shady setups rigged to evade taxes and clean dirty money that investigators are going after – ad there plenty of those domiciled in Panama and elsewhere around the world.

Department of Justice spokesman Peter Carr said of the Panama Papers:

We are aware of the reports and are reviewing them. While we cannot comment on the specifics of these alleged documents, the US Department of Justice takes very seriously all credible allegations of high-level, foreign corruption that might have a link to the United States or the U.S. financial system.

We already know there are direct and indirect links to the U.S., to U.S. citizens, and U.S. intermediary shell companies. More than 200 scanned U.S. passports were in Mossack’s email files, and more than 3500 listed shareholders have U.S. addresses. As far as shell companies, the Papers reveal 3100 companies tied to offshore “professionals” based in Miami alone.

Besides direct and indirect beneficiaries and investors in the questionable shell companies set up by Mossack Fonseca, there are thousands of other linked shell companies set up by other law firms in other jurisdictions that investigators will have to chase down.

But don’t count on too many law firms getting into hot water. For the most part, firms manage to protect themselves and their practices by distancing their interests from the activities that go on inside companies they create.

Still, not all of the hundreds of law firms in the U.S. and around the world that set up these offshore shells are going to be clean. There will be lawyers and law firms that sink along with the shady characters and companies they’re involved with.

Mossack Fonseca maintains it’s done nothing wrong. Ramon Fonseca, the law firm’s founding partner, distances the firm from beneficiaries and investors – who may be evading taxes or laundering dirty money by saying – normally the firm required banks to provide “due diligence” information verifying owners’ identities and confirming that they were not involved in overt criminal activity before setting up or managing companies created for banks’ clients.

Whether or not that’s entirely true, it directly points to banks as intermediaries and facilitators, if not outright masterminds.

These Banks Are in Hot Water Again

Back in 2013 when banks were once again under intense scrutiny for aiding and abetting U.S. tax cheats, a Credit Suisse private banker explained that “the current trend is that lawyers prepare the structure, and the bank’s focus is on managing the bank accounts (and not the structure).”  That quote comes from a Mossack Fonseca employee’s notes of a meeting with the bank.

Banks are in the thick of it again.

While lawyers in the U.S. and in some other countries are under no legal requirement to report “suspicious activity,” all banks doing business in the U.S. are required by law to do so.

So far, no big U.S. banks have been implicated in any of the Panama Papers, but that might change. However, it looks like a lot of the “usual suspects” who have been implicated, investigated, found guilty and fined by U.S. regulators and the Department of Justice are back to their old tricks.

Past offenders caught aiding and abetting U.S. tax cheats, now featured prominently in the Panama Papers, include UBS and Credit Suisse.

In 2009 UBS paid $780 million in fines, interest and restitution to avoid prosecution in a highly charged case that drew the ire of the Swiss government over Swiss banking secrecy laws UBS thought would shelter it from U.S. authorities looking into tax shelters UBS bankers set-up for thousands of U.S. citizens.

And in 2014 Credit Suisse pled guilty and paid a $2.8 billion in fines to settle criminal charges for among other actions “assisting clients in using sham entities to hide undervalued accounts.” Eighty Swiss banks subsequently settled with U.S. authorities over matters related to helping U.S. citizens evade taxes.

More than 500 banks and their subsidiaries registered at least 15,600 shell companies through Mossack Fonseca, according to the Papers.

There’s little doubt bankers may face fines and jail time for their part in the gaming.

Mossack emails show that from 2010 some banks began transferring companies out of the banks’ names and into the names of individual bank employees.

According to McClatchy, the newspaper company with complete access to all the Mossack emails, a 2010 email from Mossack Fonseca to HSBC “reveals the firm put companies into the personal names of seven HSBC bankers, including Judah and Nessim el-Maleh. Nessim el-Maleh was later convicted along with another el-Maleh brother in a cannabis-for-cash scheme in Paris, where bags of money from drug deals were laundered through HSBC accounts.”

Investigations are going to be the end of some bankers – and maybe even some banks. But, to be sure, none of the big European banks that just pay fines for their misdeeds, like you and I pay a toll to use a bridge, are going down.

But their stock prices just might head that way…

The Best Way to Short the Dirty Banks

One way to play the exposure of big European banks to fallout from the Panama Papers is to short the iShares MSCI Europe Financials (NASDAQ:EUFN). HSBC Holdings PLC accounts for 7.74% of EUFN’s portfolio and UBS Group AG another 3.75%.

Fallout from the Panama Papers is just beginning to stir some dark waters, so shorting EUFN now may be a bit premature. The ETF looks like it could get above $19 and make a run for $21-$22 if more stimulus out of the European Central Bank tickles bank investors.

But with the Panama Papers hanging over some giant European financial institutions, shorting EUFN above $21-$22 is a good bet.

I’ll be keeping you up on everything to do with the Panama Papers, and as more specific details come out, I’ll be making some very specific recommendations on how to profit from what could prove to be a treasure trove of salacious facts.

Editor’s Note: Shah’s EUFN recommendation is just the beginning. Right now, Shah’s working on a new, high-octane opportunity that could bring big profits as the world learns more about global banks’ involvement in the Panama Papers scandal.

Shah’s releasing this trade – and more dirt on the banks – to readers of his high-end research service next week.

You don’t want to miss it – click here for everything you need to get Shah’s next trade on the big banks, and you’ll also get a special look at what Shah’s calling his “Buyback Boomerang” trade, the aim of which is cash in on Wall Street’s $2.4 trillion buyback scam.

Just click here.

One Response to The Panama Papers Exposed These Dirty Banks… Here’s How You Can Profit

  1. Terry says:

    The bain of modern govtis: If something is legal, then it is “good”. Where good is honorable, is moral or the best interests of society. Not necessarily the best interests of the one making something legal, In other words there is no objective right vs wrong. Only PC and LC, legal correctness. The best examples of this are killing 6 million Jews in Germany just because they were Jews was legal. And closer to home owning slaves in the south was “legal” and the discriminating against blacks because they were black extended the “legal is good” mentality here. And even women not allowed to vote probably fits into the if it is legal it is good. This scheme is based on denying some group a fair shake and extending the power/control of people or persons in positions of authority. And many lawyers.seem to be well trained in how to find loopholes and ways and means to be very legal. They like to wiggle their way through using weasel words to skirt the law for their client as well as personal gain. The Hatch Act prohibiting the use of govt resources for personal political gain apparently does not apply to elected or appointed officials. Just hired hands, bureaucratic employees? EOs by O are examples of workarounds to push the Constitution into the trash. And some decisions by the SC exceed their Constitutional authority?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *